![bill of particulars for protective order bill of particulars for protective order](https://pendergastkc.org/sites/default/files/collections/5NARARound1/NARA-12028-0004-001.jpg)
The Silber court did not address the issue of whether the expert who submitted an affidavit on the plaintiff’s behalf had been disclosed prior to the plaintiff filing his opposition papers in response to the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Significantly, in affirming the trial court’s denial of the cross-motion, the First Department noted that the plaintiff’s proposed Amended Bill of Particulars raised a new theory of liability never previously alleged and was an “untimely substantive addition to the theory of the case.” The appellate court also made particular note of the fact that the plaintiff failed to submit with his cross-motion an affidavit or other evidence establishing a reasonable excuse for moving to amend the Bill of Particulars at such a late point in the action.
![bill of particulars for protective order bill of particulars for protective order](https://cdn.uslegal.com/uslegal-preview/MI/MI-BM-084-07/1.png)
On appeal, the Appellate Division affirmed. The trial court denied the plaintiff’s cross-motion to serve an Amended Bill of Particulars. Accordingly, the plaintiff cross-moved for permission to file an Amended Bill of Particulars one month after the plaintiff had originally opposed the defendant’s motion for summary judgment three months after Note of Issue had been filed and three years after the lawsuit began. The plaintiff also submitted a Supplemental Bill of Particulars with the opposition papers, which the defendants rejected, claiming that the plaintiff’s new Bill of Particulars had to be served as an “Amended” Bill of Particulars rather than as a Supplemental Bill of Particulars. In opposition to that motion, the plaintiff served papers that included an affidavit from an engineering expert referencing numerous building code violations never previously alleged in the plaintiff’s original Bill of Particulars. In the Silber action, the defendant, Sullivan Properties, made a post-Note of Issue motion for summary judgment. In New York, a Bill of Particulars is a pleading that is substantively equivalent to responses to interrogatories and typically details in specificity a plaintiff’s injuries, the defendant’s alleged misconduct, and the specific statutes and/or code violations that the defendant is alleged to have violated. Sullivan Properties, L.P., affirming the trial court’s denial of a plaintiff’s post-Note of Issue motion to file an Amended Bill of Particulars, which charged the defendant with violating a section of the building code that had never been previously alleged.
![bill of particulars for protective order bill of particulars for protective order](https://www.blumberg.com/cluster_images/306-default-judgment-verified-complaint.jpg)
(May 6, 2020) - On April 30, 2020, the New York’s Appellate Division, First Department, issued a decision in Silber v. Amended Bill of Particulars: If Challenged, New York Courts Will Closely Examine Such Filings Post-Note of Issue A bill of particulars becomes part of the pleading for which it is intended.Supplemental vs. After service of the bill of particulars or of a more definite pleading, or after notice of denial of his or her motion, the moving party may file his or her responsive pleading within the period to which he or she was entitled at the time of filing his or her motion, which shall not be less than five (5) calendar days in any event. Stay of period to file responsive pleading. If the order is not obeyed, or in case of insufficient compliance therewith, the court may order the striking out of the pleading or the portions thereof to which the order was directed, or make such other order as it deems just. The bill of particulars or a more definite statement ordered by the court may be filed either in a separate or in an amended pleading, serving a copy thereof on the adverse party. If the motion is granted, either in whole or in part, the compliance therewith must be effected within ten (10) calendar days from notice of the order, unless a different period is fixed by the court. Upon the filing of the motion, the clerk of court must immediately bring it to the attention of the court, which may either deny or grant it outright, or allow the parties the opportunity to be heard.
![bill of particulars for protective order bill of particulars for protective order](https://www.blumberg.com/cluster_images/319-judgment-on-default-civil-court.jpg)
Such motion shall point out the defects complained of, the paragraphs wherein they are contained, and the details desired. If the pleading is a reply, the motion must be filed within ten (10) calendar days from service thereof. Before responding to a pleading, a party may move for a definite statement or for a bill of particulars of any matter, which is not averred with sufficient definiteness or particularity, to enable him or her properly to prepare his or her responsive pleading.